According to Michael Shernerof of Scientific American (Jan. 2002) technology has advanced more in the past one century than in the previous one hundred centuries. Yet it seems from a technical perspective that many of these advances yield distinct paths and isolationist positions,where each “technology island” meets only a part of our needs. Not until a technology is fully evolved,can we apply it to our entire spectrum of problems. Some practical examples may help define “technology islands”. As the electronic typewriter evolved into a PC application such as MS Word,those who needed to utilize data adopted data base programs such as Excel,others who dealt primarily with presentations standardized on Power Point. Users were grouped or isolated into different applications based on their primary need. Yet each category of users did not have 100% of their needs met by their one primary application. Using two or three applications still limited them or at best reduced productivity. The evolution of this technology led to the Microsoft Office application allowing the seamless use of all three programs. This can be viewed as less choice; one program vs. three but yielding improved capability. “The evolution of technology is not about increasing choices,but about it’s ability to meet our spectrum of needs effectively”. Other examples include the DVD race. Currently there are three formats; one which is common and low cost,a second which is feature rich and a third which holds more data but is expensive. The evolution of this technology will be an a fordable feature rich product that holds large amounts of video data. Most of us have a home telephone number,a cellular telephone number,an e-mail address and some of us also have a personal pager number. Many choices,but not the most effective means of tracking a person down. This technology will eventually evolve to optimally meet our needs when a single personal identifier serves for all our voice and data communication,independent of our location. Yet another technological advancement,which has led us into “technology islands” is the use of plating waveforms; Direct Current (DC),Periodic Pulse (PP) and Periodic Pulse Reverse (PR). Each provides unique capability but is exclusive and limits us to that specific benefit. This paper will deal with these waveforms and introduce a bridge between today’s single waveform choice and tomorrow’s evolved product,introducing a practical method (tool) for increasing quality,capability and profitability for electroplating advanced electronic devices such as PWBs,wafers and semiconductors packaging. How is it we evolved into “electroplating technology islands”: DC,PP & PR? The short answer is that unique technologies evolve as a result of multiple companies independently advancing technology. The historic lack of cooperative effort between system integrators,chemical and power supply manufactures creates independent standards (plating methods),each driven by that individual company’s desire and competency to generate revenue.