Death,Taxes,and Environmental Compliance: Things you can count on
The European Union passed two directives in 2003 addressing the increasing amount of waste from electric and electronic equipment: (1) Directives 2002/96/ECi – Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) and (2) Directive 2002/95/ECii – Restriction on the use of certain Hazardous Substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS).
The RoHS Directive focuses on restricting the proliferation of six hazardous substances in any product which plugs into an electrical outlet or uses a battery. Member States shall ensure that,from 1 July 2006,new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market does not contain lead,mercury,cadmium,hexavalent chromium,polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) or polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE).iii The cost of not complying with the RoHS directive,or any environmental directive,is enormous. The value/cost ratio of proper
documentation is immeasurable.
There are several papers,articles,and other publications on how to make the product compliant or on the steps needed to set-up a compliance team. Companies will sell you their component compliance database; hold your hand through a consulting session on how to create the compliance team; talk to you about how to make the products in the company compliant. These are all
great first steps to meeting the directive. But what happens when a product is selected for market analysis,and is actually audited for the six banned substances?
This paper provides direction on documenting the product’s readiness to meet the RoHS directive as part of a self-declaration strategy.