Environmental compliance is becoming a global effort in the electrical and electronics industry. The Directive on “Restriction of Hazardous Substances” (RoHS) in Europe,is forcing the electronics industry to develop methods for analytical testing of its components and products for regulated substances. The use of lead (Pb),mercury (Hg),cadmium (Cd),hexavalent chromium (Cr VI),and some types of brominated flame retardants (like polybrominated biphenyls,PBB,polybrominated diphenyl ethers,PBDE) in products is being regulated. The industry is convinced of the importance to fulfill this requirement and has looked for confident testing methods to guarantee that banned substances contained in their products are within permitted limits. One of the more suitable analytical methods for the industry to screen and quantify the banned substances is
the Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) because of its nondestructive,fast and result-efficient way of analysis. Analytical techniques are required to make accurate assessments. The purpose of this paper is to discuss how we evaluated the performance of XRF analytical equipment for RoHS application for the five XRF systems including Desktop and Handheld equipment. We use standard samples and production samples for the experiments:
There were four items studied with standard samples with 10,775 readings:
1. Cpk studies with 12 standard samples including PE,PVC,aluminum alloy,brass alloy,and solder alloy types.
2. Gage reproducibility & repeatability.
3. Stability test (five readings/day,and 10 days data collections).
4. Detection level versus acquisition time.
After testing numerous samples,we selected 11 samples with RoHS compliant,non-compliant,and inconclusive compositions to send to two outsourced laboratories. We studied the correlations between XRF and two test laboratories.
With this study,we are confident in the individual XRF capabilities and accurate test levels,capabilities and accurate test levels the individual XRF have. The results provided a good reference for us to review the production sample test results with XRF. The analytical methods will be discussed in the paper.
Author(s)
Hector Rene Marin,Refugio Vicente,Escobedo Alva,Zhen (Jane) Feng,Joao Ofenboeck,Murad Kurwa