Case Study Comparing the Solderability of a Specific Pb Free No Clean Paste in Vapor Phase and Convection Reflow
To help address the environmental requirements driven by the European Union RoHS Directive,consumer applications have changed the solder alloys for the manufacturing of printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs) by removing Pb from solder. Based on the anticipated end to various exemptions and other market forces,high end server applications are now following suit. In addition,as the server/computer industry evolves,the requirements for speed and memory storage continue to increase,causing a need for higher levels of signal integrity along with greater density/mass of components and wiring within PCBA’s. This change to more dense/higher thermal mass components on PCBA’s and going to a Pb Free solder at higher melting temperature than SnPb Eutectic Solder will aggravate the temperature gradients that occur during reflow,causing major limitations when using standard IR/Convection reflow. Excessive temperature gradients can damage less massive components and less dense laminate areas of the PCBA’s. Consequently,other techniques need to be investigated,and the leading alternative is Vapor Phase Reflow. Vapor Phase Reflow is a legacy soldering method that was popular before the 1990's. Vapor Phase Reflow has a processing advantage: its thermal blanket possesses a much greater heat density than convection or IR heating. This reduces the temperature gradients across the board assembly,preventing sensitive components from exceeding maximum temperature limitations. One of the many concerns for implementing Pb Free Vapor Phase Reflow is the effect on solderability. The objective of this publication is to compare the solder wetting between Vapor Phase Reflow and Convection Reflow using a specific Pb Free (SnAgCu) SAC solder paste. This study will compare the amount of area the solder wetted,solder heights,wetting angles,and voiding.